To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Latest
Steps to take after migrating to SSL
Passkeys: no need for Limit Login Attempts?
Access violation vulnerability in Comments Like Dislike 1.1.9
The Comments Like Dislike plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to changes that an attacker can make without permission. This means that someone with very limited access, such as a subscriber, can reset the plugin’s settings. We contacted the developer and reported this to the WordPress plugin’s team 30 days ago, but the issue still hasn’t been fixed. That’s why we are now sharing this information.
Detected in:
This information is sourced from www.wpvulnerability.com. An open-source database of vulnerabilities maintained by the community. Help us out by submitting vulnerabilities!
Version compare shows which versions have a vulnerability. For example: >= 2.2.8 <= 2.2.21 means:
> from 2.2.8
= including 2.2.8 & 2.2.21
< to 2.2.21
Is this information incorrect? Please leave us a message.