To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Latest
Passkeys: no need for Limit Login Attempts?
Input validation vulnerability in No Page Comment 1.1
The No Page Comment plugin for WordPress is not secure in versions up to 1.1. This means that someone who is not authorized could send a fake request, such as a link, to a site administrator. If the administrator clicks on the link, then the plugin settings could be changed without the administrator’s permission. To fix this issue, the plugin needs to include validation for nonce on the no-page-comment-settings.php file.
Detected in:
This information is sourced from www.wpvulnerability.com. An open-source database of vulnerabilities maintained by the community. Help us out by submitting vulnerabilities!
Version compare shows which versions have a vulnerability. For example: >= 2.2.8 <= 2.2.21 means:
> from 2.2.8
= including 2.2.8 & 2.2.21
< to 2.2.21
Is this information incorrect? Please leave us a message.